Legal Opinion
Riley v. Kurtz
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 6, 1995No. 2:94-cv-71263PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOOD, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Steven D. Pepe’s Report and Recommendation dated February 28, 1995. Defendant Kurtz filed an objection thereto.
The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion for the proper reasons.
The Magistrate Judge’s Report indicates that Plaintiff raises two claims. First, Plaintiff claims that defendant retaliated and threatened to retaliate against him for the exercise of his First Amendment Rights. Second, Plaintiff claims that…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Robert Johnson, Mark Stimpson Allen BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Jimmie Lee Riley v. David T. KurtzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Scott v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Jackson-El v. WinsorDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Riley v. CoutuDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.