Legal Opinion

Seymour v. Christiansen

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1991No. H005859PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

—Plaintiff is a retired public school employee; defendants are the school district for which she worked, the district superintendent, and the school board. Defendants appeal from a summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor to the extent that it awards plaintiff a lump sum for vacation she earned but did not use during her employment. We conclude that a lump sum payment to plaintiff for vacation earned, except that earned in the months actually worked during the last year, violates state constitutional prohibitions against extra compensation for public employees. (Cal. Const., art.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Martin v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Boothby v. Atlas Mechanical, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS'ASSN. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. County of Orange v. Association of Orange County Deputy SheriffsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Am. River Fire Prot. Dist. v. BrennanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API