Legal Opinion

State v. Driscoll

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 2, 1988No. C9-88-46PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.

Eugene Driscoll appeals a judgment of conviction of DWI, claiming it was based on evidence, a station-house Intoxilyzer test (.18%), which was the result of an allegedly illegal arrest. The sole issue on appeal is whether the police officer had probable cause to arrest Driscoll.

FACTS

On March 1,1987, at a few minutes after 1:00 a.m., appellant Driscoll was driving his pickup truck along the streets of East Grand Forks, Minnesota. It was snowing at the time and there was heavy snow accumulation. Driscoll was following along in the tire tracks in the snow made by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clow v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Costillo v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Vangstad v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. VivierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Knapp v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Reeves v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. KoppiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Otto v. Comm'r SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API