Legal Opinion

Costillo v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 18, 1987No. CX-87-577PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is an implied consent proceeding. The trial court sustained the revocation of the license of the driver, Edward Costillo, because Costillo failed an implied consent test. The court of appeals held (1) that the arrest of Costillo in the doorway of his home for leaving the scene of an accident was an illegal warrantless arrest for a misdemeanor not committed in the presence of the arresting officers, (2) that the officers obtained probable cause to believe that Costillo was under the influence only as a direct result of the illegal arrest, and (3) that without…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. State v. LienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. DriscollCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Knapp v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. KoppiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API