Legal Opinion

Vangstad v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 14, 1987No. C3-86-1785PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Respondent’s driving privileges were revoked pursuant to the implied consent law, and he petitioned for judicial review. The trial court rescinded the revocation, finding the Commissioner had not met his burden of proving probable cause. The Commissioner appeals from the trial court order. Respondent has not submitted a brief, and this matter will proceed pursuant to Minn. R.Civ.App.P. 142.03. We reverse.

FACTS

On July 6, 1986, at 5:47 a.m., Officer Thomas Wells was dispatched to a convenience store where Officer Hart who was off-duty at the time was waiting with an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. State v. KvamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Eggersgluss v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Graham v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dutcher v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. DriscollCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API