Legal Opinion

Hipes v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 9028PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— Prosecution against appellant for permitting a minor to play a game of billiards upon a billiard table, of which appellant is alleged to have been the owner and manager.

It is argued by the appellant that the information is insufficient because it does not aver that the appellant was the owner, or had the care or management, of the table upon which the game was played. The allegation upon this point is as follows : “Which said billiard table he, the said Marshall Hipes, then and there being the owner of, and then and there having the care, control and.management of.” We think this is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brooster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Buell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Choen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hammann v. MinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Diblee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. City of Lafayette v. AshbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Dunn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API