Brooster v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Oarroll Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
Prosecution for an assault and battery. The affidavit, upon which the information was founded, is in these words:
££ State of Indiana, Oarroll county, Carroll Court of Common Pleas, vacation of March term, 1859. Ma/rtin Foster, upon oath says, that on, &c., atv&c., one Frederick Brooster, did unlawfully, in a rude and angry manner, strike, beat, and abuse a certain boy, whose name is unknown to the affiant, contrary, &c. (Signed), Martin Foster. Subscribed and sworn to, February 26, 1859. .(Signed), J. G. Applegate.”
Defendant moved to quash the affidavit, on the ground “that it does not appear…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by28 opinions
- Duvall v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Wolfe v. PughIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Stockwell v. BrantIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Hammann v. MinkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Mackey v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.