Legal Opinion

Girrens v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 21, 1986No. 57,590PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.;

Plaintiff Raymond Girrens appeals from a jury verdict denying recovery under the uninsured motorist clause of his father’s automobile insurance policy.

The principal facts are not in dispute. On February 27, 1977, plaintiff sustained personal injuries in an off-highway accident when the motorcycle he was riding was involved in a collision with another motorcycle, neither of which was insured. Plaintiff sustained severe injury and has been partially compensated under the medical payment and personal injury protection coverage in the policy.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Central Security Mutual Insurance v. DePintoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Douglas v. LombardinoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. State v. PaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lightner v. Centennial Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  2. Middlesex Insurance v. QuinnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Hager v. American West InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1989
  4. Sours v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  5. Thompson v. Harold Thompson TruckingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API