Legal Opinion

Central Security Mutual Insurance v. DePinto

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 27, 1984No. 55,290PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

This is a declaratory judgment action. Central Security Mutual Insurance Company appeals from the district court’s determination that exclusionary language contained within its automobile liability policy was not applicable to an automobile accident in which Victoria DePinto was driving a van belonging to Hesston College. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court; the case is before this court on a Petition for Review.

In March, 1980, Victoria DePinto was a nursing student at Hesston College. As part of her nurses training, DePinto was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. George B. Wallace Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HokansonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  3. Brown v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Miller v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Stith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Morrison Grain Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
  2. Shelter Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Heinson v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. Crawford v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  5. Penalosa Cooperative Exchange v. Farmland Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API