Krafft v. Downey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
DONOHUE, J.:
Lawrence M. and Jane A. Downey (“the Downeys”) appeal from the judgment entered against them following a jury verdict in favor of Jack and Linda Krafft (“the Kraffts”). Specifically, the Downeys challenge the denial of their motion for attorney fees under the Pennsylvania Uniform *331Trade Secrets Act (“the PUTSA”), 12 Pa. C.S.A. §§ 5301-5308. After careful review, we vacate the trial court’s order and remand for further proceedings.1
The record reflects the following facts and procedural history relevant to this appeal. The Kraffts operated a business called “Framing on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BusanetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Felmlee v. LockettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- In Re the Nomination Petitions & Papers of StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Green Bay Packaging v. Preferred Packaging, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Selective Way Insurance v. Hospitality Group Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Conxall Corporation v. Iconn Systems, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
- Peter Accurso v. Infra-Red Services IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Peter Accurso v. Infra-Red Services IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Poulides, N. v. American Theater Arts for YouthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.