Legal Opinion

Cope v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1998No. 1997-0567PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 426.] COPE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Cope v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.,

1998-Ohio-405.] Civil procedure—Class actions—Trial court abuses its discretion in denying class certification on the basis that plaintiffs failed to satisfy Civ.R. 23(B)(3)’s requirement of predominance and superiority when it fails to give adequate consideration to whether the asserted claims are susceptible of class-wide proof. (No. 97-567—Submitted February 17, 1998—Decided July 29, 1998.)…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Ojalvo v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. 26 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1192, 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,040 Josef Eggleston and Albert Viera v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union No. 130, U. A., Defendants- Edell Plummer v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union No. 130, U. A., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Morrow v. Reminger & Reminger Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Kaldenbach v. Mutual of Omaha Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Baughman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lucio v. Safe Auto InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API