Legal Opinion
In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 2002No. 2001-1912PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 465.] IN RE CONSOLIDATED MORTGAGE SATISFACTION CASES. [Cite as In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases,
2002-Ohio-6720.] Civil procedure—Class actions—Civ.R. 23(B)(3), applied—Trial court did not act unreasonably, arbitrarily, or unconscionably in certifying a class action in cases brought by mortgagors against their respective lenders for alleged violations of R.C. 5301.36. (No. 2001-1912—Submitted September 24, 2002—Decided December 18, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-010137.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Warner v. Waste Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Darby v. A-Best Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
- Barrow v. New MiamiOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Lucio v. Safe Auto InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Miller v. Painters Supply & Equip. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.