Legal Opinion
Baughman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 24, 2000No. 1999-0556PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 480.] BAUGHMAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Baughman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,
2000-Ohio-397.] Civil procedure—Civ.R. 23—Class actions—Class action treatment appropriate, when—Court of appeals’ judgment reversing trial court’s order granting certification of a class action to challenge certain practices with regard to the sale of uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage reversed. (No. 99-556—Submitted February 8, 2000—Decided May 24, 2000.) APPEAL…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Mary Jane Forbush v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- Barrow v. New MiamiOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Cullen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- New Albany Park Condominium Ass'n v. Lifestyle Communities, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.