Legal Opinion
Council 4, AFSCME v. State Board of Labor Relations
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 23, 2008No. AC 28700PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CRETELLA, J.
The plaintiff, Council 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO (union), appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the defendant state board of labor relations (labor board). On appeal, the union claims that the court should not have affirmed the decision of the labor board because the labor board’s determination that the union violated its duty of fair representation to its member, the defendant Donna Bligh, was clearly erroneous, as it was not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldstar Medical Services, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- O'CONNOR v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Labbe v. Pension CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Tuchman v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Piteau v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Papic v. BurkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Eagen v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- COUNCIL 4, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.