Legal Opinion
Inexco Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 6, 1988No. 64455PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Chief Justice.
The question we address today is whether the Corporation Commission, by repool-ing a previously pooled 640 acre drilling and spacing unit, made an error law and exceeded its jurisdiction. We answer in the affirmative.
The Corporation Commission, in Order No. 197226, created a 640 acre drilling and spacing unit and named eight common sources of supply underlying Section 23, T12N, R14W, Custer County, Oklahoma. Inexco (operator) obtained Order 260474 force pooling the spacing unit and the eight common sources of supply “as a unit, and the rights and equities of all oil and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Nilsen v. Ports of Call Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Amoco Production Co. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Crest Resources and Exploration Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bennion v. ANR Production Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- SKZ, INC. v. PettySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- New Dominion, L.L.C. v. Parks Family Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Anson Corp. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Grace Petroleum Corp. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992