Legal Opinion

Weber v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 12, 1971No. [No. 382, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

This is but another of a burgeoning number of suits against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board. The appellant in this case is John Borst Weber, who is contesting an order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County (Proctor, J.) which denied him permission to sue the Board. Weber, a Baltimore County police officer, contends that he has complied with all the requirements of Art. 66l/i, § 167, now codified with insubstantial changes as § 7-620, of the Code (1957, 1970 Repl. Yol.) and that as the injured victim of a “hit and run” automobile accident, he should be allowed to press his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Giles v. GassertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Peroti v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Hamlin MacHine Co. v. Holtite Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Vickers v. VickersNevada Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Sun Cab Co. v. WalstonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Md. Auto. Ins. FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Marcas, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Reames v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API