Legal Opinion

Esposito v. Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 12, 1975No. 165Published

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

In order to qualify to sue the Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund a claimant must comply with the requirements set forth in what is now codified as Maryland Code (1957, 1972 Repl. Vol., 1974 Cum. Supp.) Art. 48A, § 243H.1 One such requisite is that the individual who desires to sue the fund must demonstrate that he has made “all reasonable efforts” to ascertain the identity of the vehicle, its owner and its operator, which he asserts caused the accident. This statutory condition is found in section 243H (a) (l)(iv), and reads:

“All reasonable efforts have been made to ascertain the identity of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jones v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Grady v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Hickman v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Johnson v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Neubert v. Maryland Automobile Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API