Legal Opinion

Wickham v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1910No. Docket No. 131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Murphy, J. Case by Fred L. Wickham against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action on the case for damages for a personal injury to the plaintiff. On June 30, 1906, the plaintiff was a street car conductor in the employ of the defendant. He was 35 years old, and had acted as conductor over 5 years. On the day in question he went on duty at the Dix avenue car barn about noon. He was conductor on what was known as the “ Baker line,” which extends from said car barns to the railroad track on North *278Chene street. At the time of the injury, the plaintiff’s oar was running in an easterly direction along Dix avenue between Scotten and Hubbard avenues. It was an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. PrzezdziankowskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. McDonald v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Anderson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lahti v. Tamarack Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Munn v. Michigan State Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. San Antonio Brewing Ass'n v. SievertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Baker v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Maddox v. Steel Heddle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API