Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maddox v. Steel Heddle Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 23, 1929No. 12566Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I think that a verdict should have been directed in favor of the defendant, upon the ground that no other reasonable inference can be drawn from the evidence, than that the injury sustained by the plaintiff was the result of the negligence of a fellow servant; at least, that a new trial should be ordered for obvious errors in the charge of the presiding Judge.

It appears that in the operation of a machine, consisting of a drum, upon which wire was wound, and from which it was unwound and conducted to another machine, which flattened it, the wire was allowed to “run out” on the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Armour v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Kreigh v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Butler v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Perry v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. American Bridge Co. v. SeedsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API