Legal Opinion
Varanelli v. Luddy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 3, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The facts out of which this controversy arises were fully stated in our decision when the case was previously before us. Varanelli v. Luddy, 130 Conn. 74, 32 Atl. (2d) 61. It will suffice for present purposes briefly to summarize them. Mrs. Luddy, the defendant, obtained judgment for damages against Varanelli, the plaintiff, in the City Court of Waterbury and caused the filing of a judgment lien on certain land Varanelli owned. Later she brought an action to foreclose that lien. On the file of the case appeared the entry: “Judgment for plaintiff to recover $92.18 and costs. Law day December…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- In the Matter of Gilhuly's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Campo v. OsbornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Hansen v. SchallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Varanelli v. LuddySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCoy v. Nolan Ex Rel. Providence Journal Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1948
- Knibbs v. Knibbs Construction, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1964
- State, Rourke v. Barbieri, Town ClerkConnecticut Superior Court · 1952
- Varanelli v. LuddySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- State Ex Rel Pettigrew v. Tax Comm.Connecticut Superior Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.