Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hansen v. Schall
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 16, 1940PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff is and long has been an inhabitant, elector, and taxpayer of West Haven. The defendant Scranton is clerk of its board of selectmen and of its board of finance. The other defendants are members of one or both of these boards. Number 189 of the Special Laws of 1917 makes the clerk custodian of the books, papers, and documents of both boards, and provides that these shall be open to the inspection of any inhabitant of the town at any reasonable time. On April 12, 1939, the plaintiff by letter requested the boards to permit him and Murphy & Company of New Haven as his agent, to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Webb v. AmblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- American Casualty Insurance & Security Co. v. FylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- In the Matter of Gilhuly's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Costelo v. Middlesex Banking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Heimov v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- State Ex Rel. Rourke v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- San Juan Agricultural Water Users Ass'n v. KNME-TVNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. TedescoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Hannifan v. SachsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.