Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Campo v. Osborn
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 3, 1940PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
On August 11, 1938, the Superior Court issued an alternative writ of mandamus for the plaintiff, Anthony R. Campo, requiring the defendant, commissioner of health, to forthwith “allow the rela tor to practice medicine, surgery and obstetrics . . . under the laws of this state” and “to deliver to [the plaintiff] his certificate of registration to practice . . . in Connecticut, and thereby comply with Section 2855 of the General Statutes, Revision of 1918” or “signify cause to the contrary to the Superior Court.” To this writ the defendant filed a motion to quash upon the grounds (1) that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Corcoran v. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Brein v. Connecticut Eclectic Examining BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Louis v. Brown TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- People v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Orselet v. DeMatteoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Wade's Dairy, Inc. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lechner v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.