Legal Opinion

Hendershott v. Shipman

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1954No. Civ. 19881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

In an action to quiet title to real property plaintiffs prevailed, and the defendants have appealed from the judgment. The cause was tried before the court, sitting without a jury. Plaintiffs’ title was based upon a deed issued by the city treasurer of the city of Los Angeles after proceedings leading to a sale and the issuance of a certificate of sale upon an assessment levied upon the property pursuant to the Acquisition and Improvement Act of 1911.

This is the second action between the same parties involving the same property and the same assessment sale. In the first action the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. National Surety Co. v. Architectural Decorating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Elbert, Ltd. v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Rombotis v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. McCaslin v. HamblenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Hanna v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. National Collection Agency, Inc. v. FabilaAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1979
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Hanna v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API