Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Falbo
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 1998No. 92 Civ. 6836 (PKL)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) brings this civil enforcement action seeking injunctive and other relief for alleged violations of the laws and regulations governing the trading of securities. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the SEC moves for summary judgment against defendants Robert Falbo (“Falbo”) and Lorre Meade (“Meade”). For the reasons stated in this Opinion, the SEC’s motion for summary-judgment is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
I. The Pillsbury Tender Offer
On October 4, 1988,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Donna Yun, Jerry BurchCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RorechDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Opulentica, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. YunDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.