Legal Opinion

Reynaud v. Uncle Sam Planting & Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 25, 1925No. 26986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

This appeal is in a litigation which, in one phase or another, has been before this court several times within the last three years.

In June, 1919, plaintiff, Reynaud, sued for the appointment of a receiver to the defendant company. The judgment of the district court appointing a receiver was reversed on appeal to this court. Reynaud v. Uncle Sam Planting & Mfg. Co., 152 La. 811, 94 So. 405. Subsequently said company and its stockholders sued Reynaud for damages ci used by the receivership. Uncle Sam Planting & Mfg. Co. v. Reynaud, 157 La. 955, 103 So. 276. During the receivership accounts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Opelousas, Gulf & N. E. Ry. Co. v. St. Landry Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Johnson v. Judges Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. State v. MustachiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  4. Reynaud v. Uncle Sam Planting & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. Jacob v. RousselSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. Mullins v. De Soto Securities Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1942
  3. Brown v. FurlongSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  4. State ex rel. Department of Highways v. ReimersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Uncle Sam Planting & Mfg. Co. v. ReynaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API