Brown v. Furlong
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtOverton, J.
This suit was instituted by eight of the legal heirs of Mrs. Florence A. Toombs, deceased, and by M. D. Dimitry, against the remaining legal heirs of the deceased, twenty-four in number, to effect by licitation a partition of movable and immovable property. The property sought to be partitioned is that recovered by the legal heirs of Mrs. Florence A. Toombs in Beattie v. Dimitry et al., 162 La. 571, 110 So. 759, and in Succession of Toombs, 162 La. 585, 110 So. 764.
All the heirs against whom the suit is brought are nonresidents of the state, and six of them are minors. Edward Barnett, Esq.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pfister v. CassoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Martinez v. WallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Gahn v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Beattie v. DimitrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Succession of DerignySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lalakea v. Laupahoehoe Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939
- Succession of ToombsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Powell v. LaranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Williams v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Brown v. FurlongSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.