Martz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, Senior Judge.
Floyd Martz appeals a Philadelphia Common Pleas Court order granting the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority’s (SEPTA) motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
Martz filed a two-count complaint against SEPTA, charging it with (1) false arrest and imprisonment and (2) malicious prosecution. According to that complaint, SEPTA investigators and policemen forcibly and violently seized Martz, a SEPTA conductor, while he was on duty and placed him under arrest for employee theft. These SEPTA agents also lodged a criminal complaint against Martz. As a result, Martz…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Love v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Deritis v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frazier v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Clark v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Evans v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Collins v. BopsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Wright v. DennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.