Legal Opinion

Martz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1991No. 1894 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

Floyd Martz appeals a Philadelphia Common Pleas Court order granting the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority’s (SEPTA) motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Martz filed a two-count complaint against SEPTA, charging it with (1) false arrest and imprisonment and (2) malicious prosecution. According to that complaint, SEPTA investigators and policemen forcibly and violently seized Martz, a SEPTA conductor, while he was on duty and placed him under arrest for employee theft. These SEPTA agents also lodged a criminal complaint against Martz. As a result, Martz…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Love v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Marshall v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Deritis v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Clark v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Evans v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Collins v. BopsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Wright v. DennyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API