Evans v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PALLADINO, Judge.
Appellants Elizabeth and Andrea Denise Evans (collectively, Evans)1 appeal an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) which granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) because SEPTA has sovereign immunity. We affirm.
The following facts are undisputed by the parties. On December 2, 1985, Andrea Denise Evans was a passenger aboard a SEPTA elevated train when three other female passengers began to harass her. In an effort to avoid additional harassment, Andrea Denise attempted to move…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Moore v. PA. DEPT. OF JUSTICECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Chevalier v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Peters Township School Authority v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frazier v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Donnelly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Greenleaf v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Evans v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- J. Adams v. SEPTACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.