Legal Opinion
Wright v. Denny
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 25, 2011No. 530 C.D. 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge KELLEY.
Joe Wright and Sharon Wright, husband and wife, (collectively, the Wrights) appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court), which denied their post-trial motion. We affirm.
The Wrights filed suit against defendants Sirod Denny and Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) to recover damages stemming from an accident pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1799.7. The complaint alleged that on June 30, 2007, Joe Wright was a passenger onboard a SEPTA bus. At the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Love v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Jones v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Temple University Hospital, Inc. v. Healthcare Management Alternatives, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Corbett v. MansonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Gallagher v. COM. OF PA., BUR. OF CORR.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Balentine v. Aplt. v. Chester Water AuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Knox v. SEPTACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Balentine v. Aplt. v. Chester Water AuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Trinity Contracting, Inc. v. Municipal Sewage Authority of the Twp. of Sewickley and Gibson-Thomas Engineering Co., Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015