Legal Opinion
Aqua Shield v. Interpool Pool Cover Team
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 22, 2014No. 2014-1263PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TARANTO, Circuit Judge.
Aqua Shield sued Inter Pool Cover Team, Alukov Hz spol. s.r.o., Alukov spol. s.r.o., and Pool & Spa Enclosures (collectively, IPC) for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,637,160. Aqua Shield won summary judgment that IPC infringed and that no claim was invalid. A bench trial led eventually to determinations that Aqua Shield was entitled to damages in the form of a royalty of $10,800 and that IPC had not been willful in its infringement. Aqua Shield appeals the amount of the royalty award and the finding of no willfulness that led to the denial of enhanced damages and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Genentech, Inc. v. Novo Nordisk, A/s, Novo Nordisk of North America, Inc. And Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Laserdynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Eve-Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Astrazeneca Ab v. Apotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Prism Technologies LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.