Legal Opinion

Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 2, 2015No. 2013-1576, 2013-1577PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Warsaw Orthopedic (“Warsaw”) brought suit against NuVasive, Inc. (“NuVasive”) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,860,973 (“the '973 patent”) and 6,945,933 (“the '933 patent”). NuVasive counterclaimed for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,470,236 (“the '236 patent”) against Warsaw and its related company, Med-tronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. (“MSD”). For each of the three patents, the district court sustained jury findings of infringement, awarded damages for past infringement, and awarded an ongoing royalty rate. Both parties appealed. We affirm the district court with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Sonix Technology Co., Ltd. v. Publications InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  3. Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  4. Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  5. Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API