Legal Opinion

Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 49)

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1996No. SC S42632Published

1Opinion of the Court

909 P.2d 1228 (1996)

322 Or. 550

Ruth ASCHER, Lynn R. Nakamoto, Emilio Hernandez, Jr., James Posey, Jann Carson, Petitioners,

v.

Theodore KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.

SC S42632.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted October 31, 1995.

Decided February 1, 1996.

Reconsideration Allowed February 29, 1996.

Scott Meyer, of Mitchell, Lang & Smith, Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sizemore v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Aughenbaugh v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Nakamoto v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Ascher v. KULONGOSKI (ELECTIONS DIV. 49)Oregon Supreme Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API