Legal Opinion

Bradford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1987No. 52042PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his second Rule 27.-26 motion. We affirm.

Movant was convicted of murder second degree and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. On direct appeal the conviction was affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b). State v. Bradford, 652 S.W.2d 138 (Mo.App.1983). On April 26, 1984, movant filed his first Rule 27.26 motion in which he challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. That motion was denied without an evidentiary hearing. The denial of post-conviction relief was affirmed on appeal. Bradford…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stokes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Bradford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. BradleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. State v. BradfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Putney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Wooten v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Meade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Hood v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API