Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 24, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.

The plaintiff seeks to hold three officers of the bankrupt corporation, S. M. Williamson & Co., liable for loss of a fund placed with said corporation for investment. The trial judge, at the close of the plaintiff’s proof, directed a verdict in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The theory of plaintiff is that she turned over to S. M. Williamson & Co. a fund of $10,000 for investment; that same was kept invested for a number of years, but for some time prior to the bankruptcy of the corporation $5,500 of said fund was left uninvested, and deposited in the general account…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Wallace v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Winchester v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Nunnelly v. Southern Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Ezell v. TiptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dowell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API