Duncan v. Williamson
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtHeiskell, J.
The plaintiff seeks to hold three officers of the bankrupt corporation, S. M. Williamson & Co., liable for loss of a fund placed with said corporation for investment. The trial judge, at the close of the plaintiff’s proof, directed a verdict in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiff has appealed.
The theory of plaintiff is that she turned over to S. M. Williamson & Co. a fund of $10,000 for investment; that same was kept invested for a number of years, but for some time prior to the bankruptcy of the corporation $5,500 of said fund was left uninvested, and deposited in the general account…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Wallace v. Lincoln Savings BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Winchester v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Nunnelly v. Southern Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Ezell v. TiptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Dowell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977