Legal Opinion
Paneno v. Centres for Academic Programmes Abroad Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 27, 2004No. B162753PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHMANN-GERST, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Rocky Paneno (Paneno) appeals from the trial court’s order granting respondent Centres for Academic Programmes Abroad Ltd. now known as The CAPA Foundation’s (CAPA-UK) motion to quash service of summons. We reverse that order. Pursuant to the “representative services” doctrine, as discussed in Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior Court (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 523, 542-543 [99 Cal.Rptr.2d 824] (Sonora Diamond), the Consortium for International Education, Inc. doing business as the Centers for Academic Programs Abroad, Inc. (CAPA-USA) functioned as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- F. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I & IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- In Re Automobile Antitrust Cases I and IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- AQUILA, INC. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Strasner v. Touchstone Wireless Repair & Logistics, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.