Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Coney v. Hicklin
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 27, 1933No. 13564PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice StabeEr.
These two suits, instituted in the original jurisdiction of the Court, were heard together on argument, and will be disposed of in one opinion. For the sake of convenience we will refer to them as the Hicklin case and the Blalock case. With the exception of one question applicable only to the latter, the questions involved in the two cases are identical.
It is alleged and admitted that the respondents come within Class F of motor vehicle carriers, defined in the amendatory Act of April 7, 1930 (36 Stat. at Large, page 1068), as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hicklin v. ConeySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Windham v. PaceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Arnold v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- State v. KingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
- Kelly v. FinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.