Legal Opinion

State v. Lindsay

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 4, 2013No. AC 33835PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J.

The defendant, Kevin Lindsay, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after *162a jury trial, of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (3).1 He claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motions for a judgment of acquittal because the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish that he caused serious physical injury to the victim and (2) denied his motion for a new trial due to (a) incorrect evidentiary rulings, (b) prosecutorial impropriety and (c) instructional error. We affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. HolleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. State v. Orlando F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  5. Healey v. Haymond Law Firm, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API