State v. Lindsay
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Kevin Lindsay, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after *162a jury trial, of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (3).1 He claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motions for a judgment of acquittal because the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish that he caused serious physical injury to the victim and (2) denied his motion for a new trial due to (a) incorrect evidentiary rulings, (b) prosecutorial impropriety and (c) instructional error. We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. HolleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. Orlando F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Healey v. Haymond Law Firm, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017