Legal Opinion

Healey v. Haymond Law Firm, P.C.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 27, 2017No. AC38599PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.

The defendant, The Haymond Law Firm, P.C., 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, awarding its former employee, the plaintiff, Robert E. Healey, damages for unpaid wages pursuant to General Statutes § 31-72. 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred by charging the jury on the amended version of § 31-72 because the amendment took effect after this action had commenced. Therefore, the defendant argues, the court was required to charge the jury on the repealed version of that statute that had been in effect at the time the alleged injuries…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. State v. CruzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. State v. McClainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. SalzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Casablanca v. CasablancaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities ex rel. Pizzoferrato v. Mansions, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API