State v. Rachuy
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of five counts of theft by swindle in Pine County. Appellant raises numerous issues of procedural and substantive error including improper sentencing and failure of the trial court to give proper jury instructions.
Affirmed.
FACTS
Appellant was released from jail in Washington County in August 1990 where he was due to go to trial in October 1990 on charges of theft by swindle. These charges stemmed from the sale and nondelivery of log home kits by appellant, operating under the business name Minnesota Log Homes. Following his release from custody,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. O'HAGANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RachuySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. FleminoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. RachuySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993