Legal Opinion
Select Comfort Corp. v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 23, 2013No. Civil No. 13-2451 (DWF/SER)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on a Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order brought by Plaintiff Select Comfort Corporation (“Select Comfort”) against Defendant Mattress Firm Holding Corp., d/b/a Mattress Firm (“Mattress Firm”). (Doc. No. 39.) The motion is not against Defendant Tempur Sealy International, Inc., d/b/a/ Tempur-Pedic at this time. For the reasons set forth below, and presented by the Court at the hearing on the Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, the Court grants in part and denies in part Select…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United Industries Corp. v. Clorox Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Calvin Klein Cosmetics Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Gelco Corp. v. Coniston PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. Fendi Usa, Inc., and Fendi Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BCBSM, Inc. v. GS Labs, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Core Distribution, Inc. v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018