Legal Opinion
Badger Furniture Co. v. Industrial Commission of Wisconsin
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.
Sec. 102.03, Stats. 1925, provides that liability for compensation shall exist under the act—
“(2) Where, at the time of the accident, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment.
*136“Every employee going to and from his employment in the ordinary and usual way, while on the premises of his employer, shall be deemed to be performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment.”
The injured employee, when accidentally injured, was plainly within the course of his employment. He had come to his work a few minutes before the whistle was to blow to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vennen v. New Dells Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Holt Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Northwestern Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Hackley-Phelps-Bonnell Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crilly v. BallouMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Mutual Implement & Hardware Ins. v. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1952
- Peterman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.