In re Patterson-MacDonald Shipbuilding Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The primary question is: Did the master have the right to receive the awards of the arbitrators? The contracting parties had a right, on entering into the contract, to provide a mode and method by which disputes arising in carrying forward the contract should be settled. However parties are not permitted on the ground of public policy to close access to the courts, but may, as a condition precedent to application to the courts, agree to a mode of settlement out of court, *280and .where such proceeding is provided then a party' must offer, it has-been held, to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- McCracken v. HaywardSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BraySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cunningham v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1943
- John W. Daniel & Co. v. Janaf, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1958
- In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Agency, Inc. & HolzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Harmon v. KomisarCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932