Legal Opinion

Airstream, Inc. v. CIT Financial Services, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1988No. 16857PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Judge.

Most of the facts giving rise to this controversy are well set out in Airstream, Inc. v. CIT Financial Services, Inc., 111 Idaho 307, 723 P.2d 851 (1986) (Airstream I), which reversed a district court judgment in favor of Airstream, and remanded for a finding to ascertain CIT’s intent in the endorsement by one of its clerical employees (Kristin Haustveit) of a check delivered to it by the Boise Airstream dealer (Shuler), and also for findings relating to the usages of the trade and course of dealings be tween Airstream and Shuler. Airstream I, 111 Idaho at 313, 723 P.2d at…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Suitts v. First Security Bank of Idaho, N.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Carlson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Brooks v. TannerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alumet v. Bear Lake Grazing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Swanson v. SwansonIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Insurance Associates Corp. v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Chen v. ConwayIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Swope v. SwopeIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API