Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Doherty, Rumble & Butler
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 18, 1992No. C2-91-626Published
1Opinion of the Court
481 N.W.2d 120 (1992)
Richard L. BROOKS, Appellant,
v.
DOHERTY, RUMBLE & BUTLER, et al., Respondents.
No. C2-91-626.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
February 18, 1992.
Review Denied April 29, 1992.
Joseph A. Nilan, Lang, Pauly & Gregerson, Ltd., Christopher R. Walsh, Minneapolis, for Richard L. Brooks, appellant.
Curtis D. Forslund, Tamara Hjelle Olsen, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Minneapolis, for Doherty, Rumble & Butler, et al., respondents.
Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and HUSPENI and SHORT, JJ.
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant challenges the jury's finding of no actual…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Gruenhagen v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.