Empire State Bank v. Devereaux
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Empire State Bank appeals from a judgment in favor of respondents Douglas and Helen Devereaux. The trial court determined appellant may not enforce a mortgage against respondents’ property since the mortgage only secured a $46,500 loan and that loan had already been repaid. Appellant claims the mortgage is enforceable because it was to act as security for respondents’ entire previous debt with the bank. We affirm.
FACTS
On March 17, 1985 respondents Douglas and Helen Devereaux went to the Empire State Bank and talked with Gary Gabriel-son about a loan of $46,500 to pay for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Janssen v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by13 opinions
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Mrozik Construction, Inc. v. Lovering Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Stinson v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Collins v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- National Union Fire Insurance v. Schwing America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.