Legal Opinion

Miller v. Pacific First Federal

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1976No. 43808PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

On June 19, 1972, Larry R. Miller and Máry Ann Miller, the appellants, executed a general promissory note and accompanying real estate mortgage with Pacific First Federal Savings and Loan Association, the respondent. The promissory note contains the following provision:

I understand this loan is personal to me and is to be secured by a mortgage or deed of trust on real property and that my personal responsibility and occupancy ': and/or control of such real property is a material inducement to lender to make said loan. If title to said property shall pass from me by deed or otherwise, or said…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wisconsin Wire WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Gunther v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Perry's Landing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Williams v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API