People v. Pyle
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Defendant was convicted on both counts of an information filed in the Superior Court of the County of Sacramento which charged violations of section 288 of the Penal Code, on two different dates in October, 1946. The victim of the offenses is the daughter of defendant and was, at the date thereof, aged eleven years.
On this appeal from the judgment of conviction appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, that it was not sufficiently corroborated, and that the testimony of the child, the complaining witness, is inherently improbable.
We find no merit in these…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. LanhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. SmittcampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MadridIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. ManuelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- State v. MadridIdaho Supreme Court · 1953