Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1944No. Crim. 1852PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

In an information filed by the district attorney of Sacramento County defendant was charged with two counts of incest in that he, on December 16 and December 24, 1942, had sexual intercourse with his daughter; with two counts of rape of one Elsie M. who was then under the age of eighteen years, and with three counts of rape of Dorothy M., also under the age of eighteen years. He was found guilty of all of the seven counts, and a subsequent motion for a new trial was denied.

It is unnecessary to enter into a recital of the evidence in the case. As to each of the offenses charged there is ample…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  3. People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API