Legal Opinion

People v. Smittcamp

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1945No. Crim. 3867PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Appellant was charged in an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County in counts I and III with violations of section 288 of the Penal Code, and in count II with statutory rape. The jury returned verdicts of guilty as to counts I and III, and, having failed to agree upon a verdict as to count II, the court declared a mistrial as to that count and on its own motion dismissed it “in the interest of justice.” Thereafter a motion for a new trial as to the counts upon which defendant was convicted was made and denied. Thereupon, proceedings were suspended as to said counts…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  4. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. People v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. HurdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. BaumgartnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. MasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. O'MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API