Legal Opinion

Morehart v. Barton

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 12, 2010No. 1 CA-SA 10-0126PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

¶ 1 Patricia Morehart and Colleen Duffy (“Petitioners”) challenge the trial court’s order granting an ex parte hearing to William Craig Miller (“Defendant”) for the purpose of addressing mitigation matters. We hold that Petitioners have the right to attend the hearing and we therefore accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Defendant was indicted on five counts of first-degree murder, and the State subsequently filed a notice of intent to seek the death penalty. Petitioners, who are family members of individuals whom Defendant allegedly murdered, are “victims”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. State v. Michael ApeltArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. BarnettTennessee Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morehart v. BartonArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. State of Arizona v. John David Franklin, Sr. & John David Franklin, Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API